Teacher Interview Results

This represents teacher responses regarding their experiences with the RIP program.  These reports represent unfiltered interactions between the end-users of the RIP program and the independent evaluator, during which the teachers could have expressed their feelings with no fear of reprisal, and as such presented an opportunity for any difficulties or weaknesses in the program to appear.  It is significant, in my opinion, that all the responses were frank, honest and uniformly positive. 

Describe interaction process: A sampling of teachers were interviewed, by way of email and/or follow-up call. 

In this section, we present the responses of teachers in the RIP program to questions about their experiences.  The responses are unedited and verbatim. 

Jami Muranaka -  A High School Biology Teacher - 2006-07 Teacher of the Year.  
About Jami:  Jami has taken years of science course-work and feels that this is the first course that has given her a sense of clarity and accuracy, as well as a solid background in statistics.  She appreciates the value in having a program that is child centered.  However, realistic to the classroom challenges of limited time and an immense amount of content to cover, implementing the process was an obstacle to be overcome.  She realizes that she needs to practice the RIP to really master it, but hopes to get better at it over time. This coming year she will be out of the classroom and will be in a supportive professional developer role (a duty required of 'Teacher of the Year' award recipients). Jami has already indicated that she plans to continue the RIP and will use part of her service time to support the program?

Teacher Impact:

"How has RIP training helped to enhance your teaching?"  My students participate in inquiry much more now, and to a deeper level. Before the RIP training, I seldom used statistical analyses in my classroom, but now I include it with every inquiry my students do. With each unit I teach, I try to incorporate some sort of inquiry into the curriculum and it has made teaching scientific inquiry much easier for me.

"Do you think it is important to provide professional development in the area of Science? ABSOLUTELY YES! Many elementary level teachers admit that science is their weakest subject. Most, if not all, have never been trained in how to teach scientific inquiry. It's amazing what teachers can do with their science curriculum once they are taught how to teach science. And I am amazed at what the students can do at even the kindergarten level! Many secondary teachers still teach science the traditional way - cookbook labs and activities - because that is how they were taught when they were in school. We need to train teachers in the inquiry process since most science teachers are not scientists.

"How do could you use your current line to help support the implementation of the RIP in your complex?" At the present time I am collecting baseline data of students who have never learned the RIP so that we can compare them with students who have been RIP trained - that will give us a better idea of how effective the RIP actually is in teaching scientific inquiry. I will also be serving as a life science mentor to other teachers (in particular elementary teachers who may need help with content knowledge).

Student Impact:

"When fully implementing this approach, what impact to you think the RIP has on the level of rigor and depth of understanding of your students?" Many of my students have never had the opportunity to participate in open inquiries before coming to my class. When asked to make observations and formulate a research question, they are dumbfounded because in the past they have always been told what the research question was and how to investigate it. I think the fact that my students can actually formulate a research question and construct a testable hypothesis on their own is evidence that they are being challenged to think critically. Also, when including statistical analyses within the inquiry, students understand that a conclusion cannot be made unless data is statistically significant. Before learning the RIP, students have the misconceptions that they make a conclusion no matter what and that a hypothesis is either "right" or "wrong". If there is one thing I want my students to understand about inquiry, it is that a hypothesis is never right or wrong - just supported or rejected. Finally, the RIP teaches them to use the language that scientists use.

"What did you observe about the RIP and your student's reaction to the program, process and rigor?" Our students are still getting used to being challenged to think critically, so at first they complain about how hard the RIP is. But once you show them how fun it can be and repeat the process over and over, they start to "get it" and eventually enjoy it. They like the fact that they are "doing" science, not just learning science.

Complex Impact:

"What value do you see this process would have when trying to implement complex wide?" All science teachers will be talking the same language so students won't have to learn new scientific language each year. Each year builds on the level prior rather than starting from scratch with your own way of teaching the scientific method.

"Kaimuki High School has students feeding in from the school also having RIP implementation - is that of any value?" If students enter high school already knowing the RIP, I won't have to reteach it them and can then do more content-based inquiries rather than simple guided inquiries to start off the school year.

"What value is there to expand that training and collaborating with our other complex area schools (Kalani Complex)" There is still a lot of student movement between complexes - we receive students from Kalani during the middle of the school year, and they receive students from us. It is also nice to be able to collaborate with other Biology teachers from Kalani since I am the only RIP trained Biology teacher at Kaimuki High.

"What are the particular challenges of the Hawaii student population? Of the population at your school?" The greatest challenge is the emphasis nationwide on math and reading. This has greatly affected the amount of time teachers teach science. In Hawaii, we have many Polynesian and Micronesian immigrants who don't speak English very well, so the scientific vocabulary can be quite overwhelming. At Kaimuki High, we have a high ESL and SpED population and many students who have lost interest in science and in school in general. Math and writing skills are particularly lacking in our students.­­­­­­­­­­­

Bernice Ishida - Grade 4 and Technology Teacher Ala Wai                        
 About Bernice:       Bernice is very enthusiastic, and believes that the RIP has made teaching fun again.  She took on a huge task of trying to teach science to Grade 4 in addition to teaching technology classes.  She planned an all day RIP Fieldtrip where she and Dr. Landsman planned a team teaching unit on the electric fish.  It was very successful.

Teacher Impact:

"What impact has RIP had on your teaching?"  “RIP has revitalized my energy level with regard to planning lessons because it provides opportunities to be creative.  No drill and kill to learn concepts.  It was fun teaching as I was learning as much, if not more than my students.  I enjoyed doing the planning, preparation, gathering materials.   The best part was the support from Dr. Landsman, Pam Kohara, and my 2 colleagues.”

Student Impact:

"Do you see any change in the student's attitude, confidence, or science skills and knowledge?"  “The students seemed more excited for our class to meet every Friday.  Because of scheduling conflicts we had to cancel some Friday sessions, and students complained about not having time for Science.  If anything, I think they improved their observations skills which was below par when we began the first lesson.  Critical thinking, problem solving, collaboration skills hopefully were improved.  A few students' self-esteem improved as there were no opportunities for failure.  Students low in reading, math performance tests participated and there were more opportunities for collaborative learning than with other science programs.  I am curious to see how much is retained when they, as 5th graders take the Science tests this October.”

"What was your biggest "ahhh" moment?"  My biggest "ahhh" moment was when a student who was always in trouble with the administration, counselor, teachers, and other classmates, nailed the hypothesis for our ‘Electric Fish Project’.  It was like a moment of redemption for all the trouble he caused everyone.  Students and teachers who were present during the lesson seemed to have a new respect for him, and he too, felt and I think continues to feel, a new self worth.  His homeroom teacher commented that he noticed a behavior change...for the better since that particular science lesson.”

Anne McKnight - Grade 7 Teacher at Washington Middle School  
 About Anne: Anne is masterful at creating partnerships with outside individuals and groups to provide content support.  She used resources at the University of Hawaii to help her with a termite study.  She also took on multiple groups of student-generated independent RIPs.  She reports that it was challenging, but she was quite successful.  Her most difficult group of students (according to her report) actually came up with the most engaging study.   Anne also assembled an elegant and extensive PowerPoint for her final presentation. Anne submitted a proposal to present at the NSTA Conference.

 

Teacher Impact:
"Do you find that RIP can be effectively integrated into your Science Program at your school?" “The RIP process is very flexible in terms of the content and standards that can be addressed in each RIP. I found it very easy to integrate...although not all my RIPs were equally successful. I was quite pleased with how the rigor of a RIP meant that students really grappled with scientific method plus the additional life science concepts necessary to understand to complete each RIP. I think doing the RIPs as a culminating project each quarter made the concepts covered during the quarter much more real to the students.”

"How do you pick your content for your studies?" “I chose RIP topics that I was personally very comfortable with, and that I thought would really ask students to grapple with the standard that seems to me most essential for 7th graders - energy flow in the ecosystem - for 3 of the 4 topics. The 4th topic was the pulse study suggested by Dr Landsman.”


"How many RIP studies did you conduct within the year?" “4 RIP topics were: Termites, Pulse, Mold, Plants.  For each topic, 9 different RIP lab groups were running semi-independent studies. Each group created their own question, hypothesis etc.”

 

Student Impact:

"How did the students respond to the process? Most students found the initial RIP extremely difficult. Learning the nature of, reasoning for and best ways to complete each section of the RIP was a steep uphill climb all the way. Accurate data gathering was very challenging, calculating central tendency was a headache. The statistics of standard deviation was quite beyond their grasp. We did 4 RIPs and they continued to moan throughout the year...all the while making tremendous strides in what they were able to understand and complete independently. By the 4th RIP, all students seemed far more resourceful when they met challenges, some even excited and creative. As 8th graders, many students have visited to tell me that they miss the challenge of designing their own investigations.”

"Summarize why you chose to feature various students with various abilities in your Power point?" “I chose 3 students of types that I thought normally might not be represented at a science fair. The first student has an ESL background (mainstreamed for 4 years, but speaking Vietnamese only at home), the second is low income (free/reduced lunch) and from Micronesia (a population that in many cases struggles academically),  the third received SPED services until 4th quarter in 6th grade and also has one parent with limited English. I picked 3 who I thought started off the year thinking all science, especially a RIP was terribly difficult, but gradually became comfortable with and fairly proficient in completing a RIP as a member of a team (although not the same team.)  I was interested in tracking how they responded to challenging content and methods
.”

_______________________________________________________________________

Shari Kaneshiro -  Grade 6 Teacher at the only Non-Title I School in the Complex.
About Shari:    Shari has taken what she did with the RIP and expanded it into a very intriguing aspect of her teaching style.  This has opened doors for her and she was asked to present at a local professional conference.  Her expertise was acknowledged and she has been asked to attend other professional recognition opportunities.  She believes the RIP has made her a highly qualified professional.  She also wrote a proposal for NSTA.

 

Teacher impact:
"What was your RIP study about?"My study compared the accuracy of a laser gun against the formula of rate=distance/time.  We received help from our local police department  - an officer tracked my students as they ran 50 yards with his laser gun.  My other students timed the same runners using a stopwatch.”

"What how many and what kinds of conferences have you shared at?"  “I have shared at the GEAR UP "Showcase of Promising Practices" conference in February of 2007 in Honolulu, Hawaii.  I have also submitted a proposal to present at the NSTA national conference in March 2008 (awaiting a response from NSTA).”

 

"What is it like being recognized for your professionalism?" It is very humbling to be recognized for something that I enjoy doing.  Being able to excite students about learning is the best reward.

 

"How has RIP changed the way you approach science?"  The RIP has helped me to be less intimidated about teaching science concepts that earlier seemed too difficult to teach.  The process allows my students to become scientists and they truly enjoy this!  The process also allows me to integrate math, writing, reading and oral presentation skills into each lesson.  RIP has the students lead the way to learning.

Student Impact:

"What were the student learnings and outcomes?" “The students found that the raw data showed a correlation between the laser gun and the formula for determining speed.  They also learned about standard deviation and how to calculate this using their data.”

"What did you observe about the RIP and your student's reaction to the program, process and rigor?"  The RIP was not hard to teach to my students who are in elementary school.  It involves a lot of critical thinking and they really got very interested in their study.  They also enjoyed working with the numbers and standard deviation which I think helped to increase their confidence in math.

"How did you involve community support in your project?" At first, I tried to ask companies if they would donate a laser speed gun but I later changed my mind since I didn't think that I was an expert at using the gun and this might compromise the trials/experiment.  I called our local police department and explained my project and they were more than willing to help out!  The police officer who is also our school's JPO (Junior Police Officer) advisor, is also a patrol officer and is an expert with the laser gun.  He came in and explained the history of the speed guns (radar, laser) and how/why they use the guns.  He then clocked each student as they ran the 50 yards and helped us record the data. 

 

Wendy Gonsalves - Grade 3 Teacher at Lunalilo  About Wendy:  Wendy is a new teacher.  At first she asked a lot of questions and was very confused about the process, but she eventually developed confidence that quite apparent.  She is very task oriented and has high expectations of herself and her students.   She pushes the students hard and both she and the students had some initial difficulties in moving away from traditional science teaching methods and into the RIP methodology.  Wendy struggled to get the kids to think for themselves.  At first the kids reaction was ..."You want us to do what?"   Slowly, the kids started to learn that they had control over their own learning and had to take ownership.   Wendy realized she was making progress when the students opted to continue to do their science lesson that cut into their math time.  They knew that if they continued the science they would have to do more math for homework.  They chose to continue.  


Wendy did the perhaps the best job of following the RIP process really carefully.  Dr. Landsman visited the class for a career day and was able to do a Q&A with the kids.  He was amazed at the level of understanding and at their ability to correlate the sounds around their classroom with specific wavelengths and frequencies.  

Wendy shared the RIP with her faculty.  Her principal sees her as a real leader and is using her as an example of where they would like science to be at Lunalilo School.  From her sharing she was able to encourage 3 other teachers to participate in the year 2 training.  All 3 teachers informed the Vice principal of how great they thought the workshop had been.  Wendy also submitted a proposal to present at the NSTA Conference.

Teacher impact:

"What impact has RIP had on your teaching? “It has made me much more confident in teaching science and in turn I am excited to see where each year's group of students will take us in the content.”

"Do you see any change in your attitude, confidence, or science knowledge?" When I took the RIP, it was only my 2nd year of teaching so I actually was encouraged by the fact that I was able to put my education to good use.  At the University of Hawaii, I was taught to teach science in a student centered manner and the RIP was right along those lines.

"What are you planning to do next year with the RIP?"  “I want to just implement it into my curriculum like I did last year.  The great thing about using the RIP is that I never quite know what kind of inquiries the class will have to hit on our standards.  It will really depend on the interests of the students.”

Student impact:


"Do you see any change in the students attitude, confidence, or science knowledge?" “I saw them grow in their confidence to speak their opinions and to take risks with their learning.  I heard from a colleague in the 4th grade (she is doing RIP this year) that one of my students had asked her if they would be doing the If, then, because type of science or "the other way".  He had said it with such attitude that I felt that I did make an impact on this student.  He was actually questioning the type of learning or education that he was going to have this year.”

"How does RIP encourage rigor and high level critical thinking?" “RIP encourages the critical thinking because the students become engaged and invested in the science that they are learning.  My students initiated their own inquiries based on experiences that they had in their classroom.  These 3rd graders had learned more about sound than their 3rd grade standards had required.  

"What is your biggest success story?" I think it was when there was a district walk through and my students were working collaboratively in their groups on their group inquiries.  One of the people walking through asked the students "How did you come up with your hypothesis?"  She said that they said, "From our observations."  What was great about that was they said it with almost an air of "duh, why don't you know that?"  They felt so confident in their knowledge that they could look at an adult asking this question and actually feel almost like they were the much more knowledgeable ones in the room.

"How did you integrate assessment with the students?  For example, how did you assess the student's ability to build or construct their hypothesis? “When my students were creating group hypotheses for the simple machines inquiry, I had each student create an individual hypothesis first so that when they got together with their group they would have something to contribute.  I took these individual hypotheses and assessed them individually.  I then gave them opportunities to revise these hypotheses after having discussions within their groups.”